This artist is making use of Instagram and selfies to subvert the objectification of females throughout history – and she actually is calling it Sad Girl Theory
Self-proclaimed queen that is tragic Instagram musician Audrey Wollen stumbled on our attention this past year, marking out her very own electronic area with Judith Butler/Sailor Moon mash-ups, a twitter account documenting her real afflictions and recreations of renaissance paintings – certainly one of that has been the victim of Richard Prince’s present Instagram pillage. However, if there’s something the LA-based musician has been doing about it’s Sad Girl Theory that you need to know.
She proposes that – despite things being from the up for females these days – often being addressed whilst the reduced intercourse nevertheless sucks, so that as an work of governmental opposition we ought to acknowledge that and get as goddamn miserable once we want. “The color of feminism that is chosen for news attention is obviously the main one most palatable towards the abilities that be – unthreatening, good, public,” explains Wollen. “I felt variety of alienated by modern feminism, since it demanded a great deal of me personally (self-love, great intercourse, financial success) that i simply couldn’t provide.” Taking cues from her understanding of art concept, Wollen’s work is designed to reframe the sadness of females throughout history as a real method of fighting right straight back. Below, we got the 101 on Sad woman Theory alongside her throughts on Virginia Woolf, Brittany Murphy and objectification that is reclaiming the medium of selfies.
Just exactly How could you explain exactly just what Sad Girl Theory is?
Audrey Wollen: Sad woman Theory proposes that the sadness of girls must certanly be recognised being a act of opposition. Governmental protest is generally defined in masculine terms – as one thing outside and sometimes violent, a demonstration within the streets, a riot, a career of room. But i believe that this spectrum that is limited of excludes an entire reputation for girls that have utilized their sorrow and their self-destruction to disrupt systems of domination. Girls’ sadness is certainly not passive, self-involved or superficial; it really is a motion of liberation, it really is articulate and informed, it really is a real method of reclaiming agency over our anatomical bodies, identities, and everyday lives.
That are your favourite unfortunate girls?
Audrey Wollen: Sad woman Theory exists out from the cult of tragic queens which have always fascinated girls: individuals like Judy Garland, Marilyn Monroe, Sylvia Plath, Frida Kahlo, or Virginia Woolf. My favourites alter all the time, but at this time I’m actually into Brittany Murphy, Hannah Wilke, Elena Ferrante, Clarice Lispector, and Persephone, queen for the underworld.
How come Sad Girl Theory right that is necessary, and exactly why should most of us be sad girls?
Audrey Wollen: i do believe Sad woman Theory includes a resonance now because feminism has made such a“comeback that is big into the news lately. Personally I think like girls are increasingly being put up: we are failing at our own empowerment, when the voices that are demanding that joy are the same ones participating in our subordination if we don’t feel overjoyed about being a girl. Worldwide misogyny is not the consequence of girls lack that is’ of or self confidence. Sad Girl Theory is https://realmailorderbrides.com really a authorization slide: feminism doesn’t have to advocate for exactly just how awesome and fun being a woman is. Feminism has to acknowledge that being a lady in the field now is among the hardest things there is – it’s unimaginably painful – and that our discomfort does not have to be discarded into the title of empowerment. You can use it as being a material, a fat, a wedge, to jam that equipment and alter those habits.
“Girls’ sadness isn’t passive, self-involved or superficial; it really is a motion of liberation, it really is articulate and informed, it’s a method of reclaiming agency over our anatomies, identities, and lives Audrey that is”– Wollen
Ended up being here a moment that is specific were giving an answer to? i’m just like it will be appropriate at any true point in history.
Audrey Wollen: Completely! Before history, even! The patriarchy could be the oldest system of energy there clearly was. Sadness, rips, even self-harm have already been considered signs and symptoms of femininity for years and years. An indicator, of course – never an autonomous work. It is so worthwhile to dig deep into history and locate artefacts of women’s gestures that are liberatory will always be cornered away as “madness.” It’s comforting to learn that individuals had been never ever perhaps perhaps maybe not fighting.
Just just How are self-identified Sad Girls relating to – or subverting – the cliche of females as poor and sensitive and painful?
Audrey Wollen: i do believe that those cliches regarding the poor, delicate ladies are simply here to psych us away, because we have stuck in a catch 22: in the event that you act “strong,” you’re a bitch; in the event that you act psychological you’re poor and pathetic. When you’ve accepted that you will be likely to be affirming a sexist cliche no matter everything you do, because those cliches are made to ingest our entire existence, you can certainly do that which you actually feel just like. It’s dangerous to possess your radical politics caught in a period of response – trying to “disprove” the patriarchy, just as if the patriarchy really has many logic or evidence behind it.
exactly What projects that are current you taking care of?
Audrey Wollen: I’m wanting to compose guide, that will be the culmination of Sad woman Theory, or at the least the materialisation from it. I’m additionally investigating and dealing on an innovative new human anatomy of artwork in regards to the very early hysteria clients of Los Angeles Salpetriere, the paintings of Toulouse-Lautrec, the erotics regarding the medical center, and my resemblance to 1990s Nicole Kidman.
What inspired your variety of repetition photographs?
Audrey Wollen: It began having a solely visual love for traditional paintings that finished up spiralling as a semi-erotic want to destroy them, sublimate them. By re-performing those pictures, i desired to put myself included in a lineage – a brief history of anonymous, nude girls. Section of that is a desire to re-claim the image, to go on it straight straight back through the male hand, but In addition accept we are all followed, haunted, by these representations of girls that I am unable to escape the original. They set a typical for femininity that a lot of girls mimic unconsciously every time, that control our comprehension of what exactly is stunning, what’s sexy, what’s effective.
Therefore, there’s the pleasure of disruption (of stealing, of smearing) but additionally of recognition and dream: I would like to end up being the woman when you look at the artwork, I’ve always wished to function as woman when you look at the artwork. By placing my human body to the image, i possibly could jiggle it out of the really strict confines of history, allow it to inhale only a little, and in actual fact have a look at that which was occurring here, exactly exactly what those physical figures had been coping with, what ideals these people were guaranteeing. That provided me with an approach to consider every style of image, not only traditional paintings but conceptual art regarding the 1960s, fashion photographs, anime TV programs, etc.
They kinda remind me of exactly just what the creative art critic John Berger stated about representations of females in art – exactly exactly how they’re always looked over or applied. How can your work react to that?
Audrey Wollen: Yes, exactly! Berger is simply saying females don’t come in art as topics, just objects I don’t think we really grasp the implications of that kind of representation– we talk a lot about the objectification of women in the media or in artwork, but. You are incapable of your own actions, and you are vulnerable to anyone’s actions upon you when you are an object. You may be a hollow receptacle for other people’s desires and motions. The artwork is really a scene of genuine horror and violence, even if it is only a pleasant image of a girl that is pretty on a sleep.
So what can 21st Century Instagram girls study on art history?
Audrey Wollen: i do believe the Instagram woman has already been section of art history; she’s submerged in it. The selfie is somewhat different it still serves a similar function because it is mediated by tech and the internet rather than a man with a paintbrush, but. I’m actually enthusiastic about exactly exactly how porn, artwork, and technology have blended together to produce a entire generation of girls who endlessly repeat their particular image. I do believe that people may use these products associated with the patriarchy as tools to dismantle it: the objectification of girls may be re-staged and read differently. Therefore let’s flip it around: imagine if the naked horizontal girl had beenn’t a symbol of subordination, however a expression of rebellion? How about the type of items can help our benefit? In anime, there are a great number of figures that are half robot, half woman, that are completely infantile and eroticised whilst still being completely lethal. Exactly what do we study on her utilization of object-ness?